Ingilizce Odevime Yardim Eder Misiniz?

quote:

Orijinalden alıntı: s_black

Christmas 0.64 promil
The teams stopped by the road traffic on 31 December 2007 and the breath alcohol test performed m.ö.'n 0.64 promil alcohol output. 4 years ago for the same reason m.ö.'n apparently confiscated driver's license was confiscated driver's license for 2 years.
BC, contact the Magistrates' Court, a week after the incident, China has objected to a fine. Night of the event claiming that drinking alcohol and forced to sign the document by the police fined BC In addition, although the demand for blood tests to be taken to hospital, police said they rejected this request.

'May be different'
Magistrates' Court, m.ö.'n regarding the reliability of breath alcohol concentration measurement test results requested expert report from the Forensic Medicine Institute. Many factors can influence the Institute of Forensic Medicine reports the results of breath alcohol concentration measurement test and the test results indicated that the blood test results to be different. Despite Magistrates' Court has dismissed the case as m.ö.'n open. The court ruled that BC's drunk driving and the use of fines in accordance with the legislation specified.
BC, referring to the Court by the police officers not taken to the hospital for alcohol testing, the illegal traffic fines, the court will also take into account the expert's report which claimed that their favor. BC, made his two-year sentence given to private life to be barred from traffic, claiming that there was an unjustified interference with the complainant.

'Unacceptable'
The Court notes that the domestic courts in assessing the evidence, while detecting and reporting events in interpreting domestic law can not be arbitrary or unreasonably interfere with the decision if the move. In its decision the Court m.ö.'y given fines and two years of his decision barred from traffic, "according to the legislation and is proportionate, it is necessary in a democratic society for the prevention of treatment of the protection of public safety and crime," it said. The applicant stated that the decision did not see any circumstance in which the Court stated that the proceedings were unacceptable for these reasons.